In 2014, the Supreme Court in Alice held that patent claims directed to abstract ideas are patent-ineligible unless they recite something "significantly more" than the abstract idea. What "significantly more" means has been a matter of confusion and debate ever since, particularly for patent examiners at the USPTO. For software patent applicants faced with § 101 rejections, the "significantly more" standard is a significant hurdle to overcome.
In this free patent webinar, Fish Principals Jonathan Lamberson and David Goren will discuss strategies for overcoming § 101 rejections, including:
- A discussion of recent developments in Alice jurisprudence at the PTAB and in district courts;
- Claim drafting techniques for avoiding rejections; and
- Ways to craft arguments under Alice Steps 1 and 2 to get you to allowance.
How to Defeat an Alice Rejection Webinar
Webinar Date+Time:
Wednesday, May 6, 2020
1:30-2:30 PM EDT
Register Now!
By:
Fish & Richardson, P.C.
Credit:
Fish & Richardson is an accredited CLE provider by the California, New York, and Texas State Continuing Legal Education Boards. (California Provider Number 4933). Fish & Richardson will apply for 1.0 hour of CLE credit in some additional states. Credit will be awarded only to attorneys who report their required CLE states during their registration process and who log in and complete the webinar in its entirety. Note that Fish is unable to grant CLE credit to attendees who listen to the audio portion only.
Register Now!
No comments:
Post a Comment