Saturday, April 29, 2017

May 2017: Web - Silence of All Virtues: Attorney-Client Privilege and Confidentiality in the Digital Age #MCLE

In the fast paced, high information era in which we live, how do you maintain client confidentiality and privilege while still meeting the demands of the client? In this course we will cover the importance of protecting client confidences, understanding electronic media, finding ethical solutions to inadvertent disclosures, ethical implications of using cloud storage and navigating the ethical minefields of social media as legal professionals.
Title:
Silence of All Virtues: Attorney-Client Privilege and Confidentiality in the Digital Age

When/Where:
By: LexisNexis
Credit: Ethics: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Maine, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, Washington (LN applies only if a WA Attorney attends), West Virginia, Wisconsin (pending).<

Friday, April 28, 2017

May 9: NYC - Police Accountability: Policing without Permission #MCLE

Over the past few years, the collective attention of the nation has focused on concerns about policing. New surveillance techniques affect all of us. Policing is increasingly militarized. And many policing tactics, such as the use of force, and stop and frisk, fall particularly heavily on communities of color and the poor. While these concerns are not new, renewed attention has provided a platform for those calling for reforms of policing tactics and increased police accountability. At the same time, there also are expressions of concern that police be permitted to do their jobs without endangering their safety.
Join the ACS New York Lawyer Chapter for a conversation at the offices of Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP about the ways in which we can increase police accountability, while ensuring police are able to do their jobs.
Title:
Police Accountability: Policing without Permission
When/Where:May 12, 2017
May 9, 2017
05:30 PM - 07:30 PM
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
425 Lexington Avenue
New York, NY 10017
Speakers:

  • Professor Barry Friedman, director of the Policing Project at New York University School of Law and author of Unwarranted: Policing without Permission
  • Professor Dennis Kenney, professor at John Jay College of Criminal Justice, former associate director of the Police Executive Research Forum, and former sergeant with the Bartow Florida Police Department.

Credit:
New York CLE credit is pending for this event.
Cost:
Admission is free, but space is limited.
By:
American Constitution Society
More Information And Registration

Thursday, April 27, 2017

May 12: San Diego - The Role of State Attorneys General and City Attorneys in the Trump Era #MCLE


The Trump Administration’s “First 100 Days” have focused on many important constitutional issues, including immigration, climate change, legalized marijuana, and border security. Governors, mayors, state legislators, city council members, and public advocates all have differing opinions on how to respond to the new policies. Jim Tierney, former Maine Attorney General, Lecturer in Law at Harvard Law School and the Director of StateAG.org, an educational resource on state attorneys general, will provide an overview of the role of State Attorneys General nationwide followed by a discussion of the local roles of Mara Elliott, San Diego City Attorney and David Loy, Legal Director of the ACLU of San Diego and Imperial Counties.
Title:
The Role of State Attorneys General and City Attorneys in the Trump Era
When/Where:
May 12, 2017
12:00 PM - 01:00 PM
Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP
655 West Broadway #1900
San Diego , CA 92101
Speakers:
  • Jim Tierney - Director of StateAG.org and former Attorney General of Maine
  • Mara Elliott - San Diego City Attorney
  • David Loy - Legal Director, ACLU of San Diego and Imperial Counties
Credit:
1 hour of general MCLE credit has been approved.
This is a brown bag lunch. Beverages will be provided.
Cost:
Admission is free, but space is limited.
By:
ACS Chapter - San Diego
More Information And Registration

Wednesday, April 26, 2017

April 27: Web - Ethical Social Media in Three Easy Steps #MCLE

In this webinar, Dan Lear, Avvo’s Director of Industry Relations, provides attorneys with a common sense approach to social media. Attorneys who attend this webinar can expect to learn:
  • Legal ethics surrounding social media use – and why you shouldn’t be afraid
  • Constitutional law that backs up lawyer social media use
  • Practical tips for dealing with grey areas that arise with emerging social media trends
Title:
Ethical Social Media in Three Easy Steps
When/Where:
April 27, 2017
10am PT / 1pm ET
Webcast - Register Now!
Dan Lear, Avvo
Speaker:
Dan Lear
By:
Avvo.com
Credit:
1hr Ethics CLE in CA, FL, IL, NV, PA, TX, OH, WA and NY
Cost:
Free. Pre-registration required.
More Information And Registration

Tuesday, April 25, 2017

April 26: Web - Supreme Court -- October Term 2016: Major Cases in an Unusual Term

What are the major cases before the Supreme Court in this unusual term, where there have been only eight justices? Expert faculty will provide a review of the major cases concerning criminal procedure, First Amendment, voting, jurisdiction, and civil rights statutes.
Cases to be addressed include:
  • Pena-Rodriguez v. Colorado
  • Buck v. Davis
  • Beckles v. U.S.
  • DiMaya v. Lynch
  • Lee v. Tam
  • Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman
  • Packingham v. North Carolina
  • Trinity Lutheran Church v. Pauley
  • Bristol Meyer Squibb v. Superior Court
  • Manuel v. City of Joliet
  • Bank of America v. City of Miami, Wells Fargo v. City of Miami
  • Hernandez v. Mesa
Register now for this free special event in celebration of Law Day and plan to join Erwin Chemerinsky, Founding Dean and Distinguished Professor of Law at the University of California, Irvine School of Law for this important discussion.
Title:
Supreme Court -- October Term 2016: Major Cases in an Unusual Term
When/Where:
April 26, 2017
4:00 PM Eastern
Webcast - Register Now!
Cost:
Free
More Information And Registration

Wednesday, April 19, 2017

April 28: Web - How Lawyers Handle Media in a Time of Crisis

In the Internet age, courtroom victories are Pyrrhic if the client’s reputation and bottom line are savaged by day’s end. The “media” is no longer just beat reporters from the local newspaper; the “media” is now anyone who owns a mobile phone. The lawyer’s job now is more challenging than ever, managing these massive audiences with one eye on the jury pool and the other on consumers and shareholders. This program provides trial lawyers with guidance on effectively doing just that and effectively anticipating what’s next.
Title:
How Lawyers Handle Media in a Time of Crisis
Speaker:
Richard Levick
When/Where:
April 28, 2017
11am Mountain time
Webcast - Register Now!
By:
National Institute for Trial Advocacy
CLE credit:
This online content is not accredited for CLE and we cannot provide a Certificate of Completion. You can apply for self-study credit by contacting your state bar organization directly. To help you with your self-study application, NITA has provided faculty biography information (via the link at the right) as well as a PDF of the PowerPoint slides, which is attached to the presentation. You can access this PDF by clicking on the link button once the presentation has begun to play. If you require verification of your attendance, please contact customerservice@nita.org
More Information and Registration

Sunday, April 16, 2017

April 27: Web - Framing the Message: Advocacy Communication Focused on Diversity and Inclusion in a New Era

In our efforts to persuade policy makers and general audiences to act on the issues we care about, we often encounter one recurring barrier: fear. Some audience members are worried, anxious and scared about a number of issues facing the country today. We need to be strategic in our communication and tell an affirmative, positive story that moving forward is more important than ever.
In this webinar, Julie Fisher-Rowe of the Opportunity Agenda, a communications firm focused on social justice, will present messaging research designed to counter these fear narratives with positive stories about values, diversity, contributions and participation. The Opportunity Agenda will share what it has learned about audiences, values, important themes, and tested language. And finally, they will provide a few ideas about how to move these audiences to positive action in today's climate.
Title:
Framing the Message: Advocacy Communication Focused on Diversity and Inclusion in a New Era
When/Where:
Free Webinar on Thursday, April 27, 2017
2 PM - 3:30 PM (EDT)
Webinar - Register Now!
Please note: This webinar can hold a maximum of 1,000 attendees. If you log in and the webinar is full, a recording of the webinar will be provided following the broadcast.
Speaker:
Julie Fisher-Rowe, Opportunity Agenda
By:
National Consumer Law Center
Credit:
NCLC does not provide CLE credits for webinars, but will give certificates of attendance following the webinar for those who are interested.
More Information And Registration

Wednesday, April 12, 2017

May/Seattle - HCMP Appellate Advocacy Competition Judges #MCLE

On behalf of the Moot Court Honor Board at the University of Washington School of Law, I am pleased to invite you to participate as a judge in our 2017 1L HCMP Appellate Advocacy Competition. The competition will take place Monday, May 8 through Monday, May 15. More information about the competition and a complete schedule may be found at the bottom of this email.

We welcome attorneys from all practice areas to participate. Volunteer judges are invaluable to the continued success of MCHB and the in-house competition program. As a judge, you will provide valuable feedback and evaluate the participants’ performance. For your service as a judge you will receive:
-          3 free CLE credits and 2.5 credits for each additional night judged*
-          Free parking
-          Dinner 

You may register to serve as a judge using this online sign-up sheet

If you are unable to serve as a judge for this competition, but would like to receive invitations to judge future competitions, please let us know via the sign-up sheet. Questions can be sent to judges@uw.edu.  

Thank you in advance for your support. We hope to see you at the competition.

Sincerely,
CaroLea Casas 
Vice President of Judges
UW Moot Court Honor Board
*Each round of competition entails a time commitment of substantive work (training, listening to competition rounds, grading, and delivering feedback) of approximately 3 to 3.5 hours. Judges will receive 0.5 credits for training activity per competition and 2.5 CLE credits for each round judged. Note that WSBA no longer places a limit on CLE credits from judging MCHB competitions.

2017 1L HCMP Appellate Advocacy 
Competition Schedule


Monday, May 8: Preliminary Round #1 
5:30-6:00 p.m.             Judge check-in and dinner; chance to review problem.
6:00-6:30 p.m. Mandatory training for judges.
6:30-9:00 p.m. Competition round and feedback.  

Tuesday, May 9: Preliminary Round #2
5:30-6:00 p.m.             Judge check-in and dinner; chance to review problem.
6:00-6:30 p.m. Mandatory training for judges.
6:30-9:00 p.m. Competition round and feedback.  

Wednesday, May 10: Quarterfinal Round
5:30-6:00 p.m.             Judge check-in and dinner; chance to review problem.
6:00-6:30 p.m. Mandatory training for judges.
6:30-9:00 p.m. Competition round and feedback.  

Thursday, May 11: Semifinal Round
5:30-6:00 p.m.     Judge check-in and dinner; chance to review problem.
6:00-6:30 p.m. Mandatory training for judges.
6:30-9:00 p.m. Competition round and feedback.  

April 13: Web - Advocacy for Low-Income Children with Disabilities in California 2017 #MCLE


  • Holistic screening and development of a child’s issues at initial intake
  • Why Individualized Education Program (IEP) timelines and goals are important
  • How to represent a student at a Manifestation Determination Meeting
  • What to do if a school denies a student a right they are entitled to as a foster youth
  • Special considerations in representing youth and transition aged adults in SSI advocacy
  • What health entitlements and resources are available for pregnant and parenting youth
  • What health entitlements and legal strategies are available for youth with mental health disabilities
  • What to do if you are representing a youth with competency issues in juvenile court
Attend this program so that you can receive the basic information you need to identify and represent low-income children in California with education, health care, and public benefits issues. Learn the basic substantive law regarding special education, discipline for students with disabilities, advocacy for foster youth, foster care benefits, CalWORKs, and SSI, so you can take a pro bono case to assist a low-income child in California.
What You Will Learn
Who Should Attend: Any attorney interested in providing pro bono assistance to low-income children in California.
Title:
Advocacy for Low-Income Children with Disabilities in California 2017
Where/When:
Webcast - Register Now!
Also presented in person in San Francisco, CA
April 13, 2017
9:00 AM Pacific
By:
PLI
More Information And Registration
Alabama: PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.
Alaska:  All PLI products can fulfill Alaska’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.
Arizona:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “interactive CLE” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via interactive CLE programs.
Arkansas:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.
California:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “participatory” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via participatory programs.
Colorado:  All PLI products can fulfill Colorado’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.
Connecticut: Effective January 1, 2017, all PLI products can fulfill Connecticut’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.
Delaware:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.
Florida:  All PLI products can fulfill Florida’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.
Georgia:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.
Hawaii:  All PLI products can fulfill Hawaii’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.
Idaho:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.
Illinois: All PLI products can fulfill Illinois' CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.
Indiana:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.
Iowa:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.
Kansas:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “traditional” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via traditional programs.
Kentucky:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.
Louisiana:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.
Maine:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.
Minnesota:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.
Mississippi:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.
Missouri:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.
Montana:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.
Nebraska:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.
Nevada:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.
New Hampshire:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.
New Jersey:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.
New Mexico:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.
New York Experienced Attorneys:  All PLI products can fulfill New York’s CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products. Newly Admitted Attorneys:  PLI’s transitional live seminars can be used to fulfill the requirements for newly admitted attorneys. All credit categories may be earned via transitional live seminars.
North Carolina:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars
North Dakota:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.
Ohio:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.
Oklahoma:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.
Oregon:  All PLI products can fulfill Oregon’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.
Pennsylvania: PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.
Puerto Rico:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.
Rhode Island:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.
South Carolina:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.
Tennessee:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.
Texas:  All PLI products can fulfill Texas’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.
Utah:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.
Vermont:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.
Virgin Islands:  All PLI products can fulfill the Virgin Islands’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.
Virginia:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live interactive” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live interactive programs.
Washington:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.
West Virginia:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.
Wisconsin:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.
Wyoming:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.
CPD Jurisdictions
British Columbia (CPD-BC):  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “real-time” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via real-time programs.
Ontario (CPD-ON):  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “interactive” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via interactive programs.
Quebec (CPD-QC): PLI’s live seminars can fulfill Quebec’s CPD requirements. 
Hong Kong (CPD-HK):  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of points an attorney can earn via live seminars.
United Kingdom (CPD-UK):  PLI’s live seminars can fulfill the United Kingdom’s CPD requirements.
Other Credit Types 
CPE Credit (NASBA): PLI’s live seminars qualify as “Group-Live delivery” credit.

Tuesday, April 11, 2017

April: Web - Answering the Call: Overcoming Substance Abuse in the Legal Profession

In this course, you will examine the characteristics of the legal profession that make attorneys so much more susceptible to substance abuse as well as review the wildly disproportionate disciplinary records.
During our session we will cover:
  • Substance Abuse Prevalence in Legal Profession 
  • Consequences of Substance Abuse in the Legal Profession
  • A Personal Story of Addiction
  • Signs of Substance Abuse and Strategies Uses to Hide Addiction Problems in the Legal Profession.
Title:
Answering the Call: Overcoming Substance Abuse in the Legal Profession

When/Where:
This webcast is scheduled multiple times - register now!
By:
LexisNexis
Credit:
Most states that allow online credits.

Monday, April 10, 2017

April: Web - Blowing Smoke: Managing New Risks in the Workplace

The National Institute of Drug Abuse puts the cost of substance abuse to our nation at $600 billion in terms of crime, lost work productivity and health care. With workplace drug and alcohol testing laws and regulations changing constantly, discover the history and background of drugs and the workplace, medical marijuana and a drug free workplace, establishing impairment levels and workplace challenges.
Title:
Blowing Smoke: Managing New Risks in the Workplace


When/Where:
This webcast is scheduled multiple times - register now!
By:
LexisNexis
Credit:
Most states that allow online credits.


May 2: NYC - Managing a Corporate Crisis: Strategies for Containing a Crisis and Controlling the Public Narrative While Meeting Ethical Obligations and Maintaining Privilege #MCLE #ethics

When a potential crisis is identified, or an actual crisis strikes, entities and their counsel must act quickly to take control of the public narrative and manage the flow of information. Doing so in a manner that maintains relevant privileges and satisfies counsel’s ethical obligations has become increasingly complex in the wake of guidance issued by the Department of Justice stressing the importance of timely disclosure of all relevant facts, including the names of individuals involved in misconduct, in order to be eligible for cooperation credit. This panel will discuss some considerations for inside counsel in implementing a crisis management plan, structuring an internal investigation, providing appropriate warnings to employees regarding their need for separate counsel, determining whether and when to self-report to government regulators and ensuring that all relevant stakeholders receive relevant information.
Topics to be covered will include:
  • Initial response to a corporate crisis
  • Engaging outside professionals
  • commencing an internal investigation
  • Receiving cooperation credit while maintaining privilege
  • Reporting to other constituents while maintaining privilege
  • Continuing Legal Education. 
Title:
Managing a Corporate Crisis: Strategies for Containing a Crisis and Controlling the Public Narrative While Meeting Ethical Obligations and Maintaining Privilege
An Ethics CLE Seminar Hosted by Dechert's Litigation Team in Conjuction with Sard Verbinnen & Co.
When/Where:
May 2, 2017
5:00 PM - 8:00 PM
New York, NY
By:
  • Dechert's Litigation Team 
  • Sard Verbinnen & Co.
Speakers:
  • Hector Gonzalez
  • David N. Kelley
  • Rebecca Kahan Waldman
  • Brandy Bergman
Credit:
  • New York: This transitional and non-transitional continuing legal education program has been approved in accordance with the requirements of the New York State Continuing Legal Education Board for a maximum of 1 credit hour, of which 1 credit hour can be applied toward the ethics and professionalism requirement.
  • New Jersey: This program has been approved by the Board on Continuing Legal Education of the Supreme Court of New Jersey for 1.2 hours of total CLE credit. Of these, 1.2 qualify as hours of credit for ethics/professionalism, and 0 qualify as hours of credit toward certification in civil trial law, criminal trial law, workers compensation law, municipal court law, and/or matrimonial law.
  • Pennsylvania: Dechert LLP is a Pennsylvania approved CLE provider. This program has been approved for 1 hour of ethics credits in Pennsylvania.
  • Connecticut: This program has been approved for a total of 1 credit hour in Connecticut of which 1 credit hours can be applied towards ethics/professionalism.

Wednesday, April 5, 2017

April: Web - Avoiding the Million Dollar Comma: The Use of Forms in Legal Drafting #MCLE

The use of forms in drafting legal documents is just one way to increase efficiency and work product quality while at the same time mitigating some of the risk associated with each document. Explore source, types and benefits of forms, find appropriate motion templates, using a form bank.

Title:
Avoiding the Million Dollar Comma: The Use of Forms in Legal Drafting
When/Where:
By:
LexisNexis
Credit:
Most states that allow online credits.

Monday, April 3, 2017

April 26: Webcast - Understanding A Spouse's Right to Immigration Financial Support

When a non-citizen gets divorced, she may be left with little means of support. Language barriers can make employment difficult, and many types of public assistance are unavailable. But many may be eligible to receive financial compensation from their (former) spouse, if the spouse was a visa sponsors.
Under immigration law in effect since 1996, certain non-citizens are entitled to financial support from their visa sponsor. In virtually all family-based immigration cases, the sponsor is required to file a Form I-864, Affidavit of Support. By signing the Form I-864, the sponsor promises to ensure that the immigrant has income at or above 125% of the Federal Poverty Guidelines. This obligation lasts until the immigrant becomes a U.S. citizen, is credited with 40 work quarters, leaves the US under certain circumstances, or dies.
But divorce does not end the sponsor’s support obligation. For this reason, some immigrants can use the Form I-864 to recover financial support from abusive spouses, even when a divorce court would be unable to award alimony.
It is important for family law attorneys to understand the support rights of the Form I-864. This support can provide crucial resources to clients who are transitioning to self-sufficiency. Form I-864 support may be available to clients who would normally not qualify for public benefits.
This training will help family law attorneys identify clients/survivors who might be able to benefit from the Form I-864. Learn easy questions that can be added to your intake procedure to screen for potential eligibility. Learn to assess the scope of support to which an individual may be entitled, and how enforcement works.
Title:
Understanding A Spouse's Right to Immigration Financial Support
When/Where:
April 26, 2017
12:00 pm - 1:00 pm
Webinar only - register now!
Cost:
Free
Website:
http://www.anymeeting.com/PIID=EC59DD89884830
By:
Sound Immigration
More Information And Registration